Yes You Can, Mr. President

The views shared on The Mideast Peace Pulse are those of the author(s) and not those of Israel Policy Forum.

Israel Policy Forum Announces its Next Chapter with Middle East Progress

Dear Friends and Supporters of Israel Policy Forum:

On behalf of Israel Policy Forum (IPF), including our President Peter Joseph and Chair Larry Zicklin, I am pleased to inform you that IPF is embarking on its next chapter. 

2010 Must Be Showtime for Mideast Peace

Assistant Director, IPF - NY

As 2009 draws to a close, we are bombarded by the annual litany of commentary features recapping the year in Hollywood movies to the year in international conflict, and everything in between.

When it comes to the Middle East peace process, current conventional wisdom suggests the 2009 recap might go something like this: 

US-Iran Negotiations: Simulation Exercise at INSS

Ephraim Asculai, Emily B. Landau, and Tamar Malz-Ginzburg

INSS Insight No. 154, December 29, 2009

Despite the tendency to denote any simulation exercise on security issues a "war game," the recent simulation designed and held at INSS did not focus on the option of a military attack. Rather, it developed the scenario of a bilateral US-Iranian negotiation over Iran's nuclear program.

Tags

Nervous Anticipation

There is nervous anticipation in the air. Starting this evening, President Peres begins his festival of consultations during which he will try to identify the most promising prospect to form the next government. Both Likud and Kadima have stuck to their scripts, each claiming their right to the role. Lieberman, as we have noted, escaped the warm up act entirely and is arriving home this evening just in time for the main show. His lips were tight in Minsk, not letting on where he stands. And now he is savoring the effect that the dramatic unfolding of his support is sure to bring. His timing is exquisite; the whole country is waiting for Yvette.

The other major issue consuming Israelis is the fate of Gilad Shalit and the new decision to connect his release to the current ceasefire talks with Hamas. Amos Gilad, the highly professional IDF negotiator who has been dealing with Egypt on the arrangements, is furious that he has become a pawn in whatever game outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is playing. He was sent to Cairo numerous times over the last several weeks to finalize an Egyptian sponsored ceasefire that showed progress on the Shalit issue but kept it on a separate track. All of a sudden Gilad finds that Olmert changed lanes on him while he was speeding ahead in his negotiations, placing both Gilad and the state in a precarious situation.  By this afternoon, the security cabinet voted to endorse the new linkage as proposed by Olmert and now demands the release of Shalit before the border crossings to Gaza are opened. While this will undoubtedly be applauded by most Israelis, Gilad is fuming.  As he told Ben Caspit in Ma'ariv:

"I don't understand what it is that they're trying to do. To insult the Egyptians? We've already insulted them. It's madness. It's simply madness. Egypt has remained almost our last ally here. For what? After all, it's damaging to national security. Our very essence here is a choice between bad alternatives to worse ones and even worse ones. The Egyptians have shown extraordinary courage. They've given us maneuvering room, they're trying to mediate, they're investing efforts, they're showing goodwill of a kind they've never shown before."

 

Trackback URL: http://israelpolicyforum.org/trackback/896