Yes You Can, Mr. President

The views shared on The Mideast Peace Pulse are those of the author(s) and not those of Israel Policy Forum.

Israel Policy Forum Announces its Next Chapter with Middle East Progress

Dear Friends and Supporters of Israel Policy Forum:

On behalf of Israel Policy Forum (IPF), including our President Peter Joseph and Chair Larry Zicklin, I am pleased to inform you that IPF is embarking on its next chapter. 

2010 Must Be Showtime for Mideast Peace

Assistant Director, IPF - NY

As 2009 draws to a close, we are bombarded by the annual litany of commentary features recapping the year in Hollywood movies to the year in international conflict, and everything in between.

When it comes to the Middle East peace process, current conventional wisdom suggests the 2009 recap might go something like this: 

US-Iran Negotiations: Simulation Exercise at INSS

Ephraim Asculai, Emily B. Landau, and Tamar Malz-Ginzburg

INSS Insight No. 154, December 29, 2009

Despite the tendency to denote any simulation exercise on security issues a "war game," the recent simulation designed and held at INSS did not focus on the option of a military attack. Rather, it developed the scenario of a bilateral US-Iranian negotiation over Iran's nuclear program.

Tags

IPF Leadership Mission to Israel and the West Bank

Last week, IPF Executive Director Nick Bunzl and President Peter Joseph returned from a leadership mission to Israel and the West Bank. They spent 3 days in high-level meetings in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and the West Bank. To read their remarks, click here.

Trackback URL: http://israelpolicyforum.org/trackback/2566

Comments

The "Peace Process"

The report back from the IPF Leadership mission is a bit vague on the subject of negotiations between the Israeli government and the PA. According to Nick Bunzl's comments, your group heard from multiple sources "that the Olmert Abbas talks had progressed far and that the gaps were small", although "Abbas responded that the gaps were still 'large'." Without specifying what the gaps were, to say they were large or small is all spin.

At the conclusion of the Taba talks in January 2001, Shlomo Ben Ami and Abu Ala read the final communiqué which claimed that the parties "have never been so close to an accord." Yet they did not reach an accord. As the old American saying goes: Close, but no cigar.

To truly understand the state of negotiations between the two sides and whether a deal is possible in the near future, we need to know the specific areas of agreement and disagreement. The Newsweek article that you cite gives Olmert's version of what he offered to Abbas, which Erekat confirmed. The Palestinians "began to formulate a response" but there's no mention of what it consisted of and "time eventually ran out". So, apparently, it was never presented to the Israelis. 

Israelis and Palestinians have been negotiating, off and on, for over 15 years without yet reaching agreement on a single "final status" issue. Apart from the questions of a settlement freeze, Hamas, Obama, Arab countries, Iran, and all the rest, just how close are the Israeli and Palestinian political establishments to cutting a deal, and what exactly are the gaps that still need to be closed?